Seek Out Honesty When Looking For An Auto Mechanic

Filed in Music Leave a comment

byAlma Abell

Buying a vehicle is one of the major investments that people make throughout their life. Because of that, it is important that this investment is taken care of with proper maintenance. In order to do this, you will need to seek out an auto mechanic in Fort Collins, CO who will be able to effectively keep your vehicle running for years to come. Because most of us will be at the mercy of an auto mechanic Fort Collins, CO, it is imperative that you seek out a company that is honest with you. Here’s how to do it:

Reputation Will Be Important

YouTube Preview Image

One of the first things that will tell you if an auto mechanic is honest is if they have a good reputation. You will be able to find out if a mechanic is reputable in a few ways. You may be able to get recommendations from trusted friends and family, for instance. You also may be able to determine if an auto repair shop is reputable based on their reviews from other customers. You should always try to look up reviews online when looking for an auto repair shop for this reason.

Contact Them and Use Your Instinct

Most people know when they are being taken for a ride, which is why in this case, if you feel as if your instinct is good, you may want to use it. By contacting and auto repair shop and speaking to someone about the needed repairs, your instinct may very well tell you if this is a company that you can trust or if you should move on to someone else. If you feel as if they are honest, perhaps you should give them a shot at repairing your car.

Compare Them to Others

If you are still not certain that a repair shop you are considering is honest, you can compare their prices and services to others in the area. For instance, if one mechanic tells you that you need one repair, say on your brakes, and charge you one price and another tells you that four things are wrong with your vehicle and charge you five times as much as the first, something is wrong…

As you can see, there are some great ways to make sure that you are working with an honest company. Before leaving your car with anyone, make sure they meet the requirements above.

If you are seeking out a very honest and reliable auto mechanic in Fort Collins, CO, contact A & B Import Auto. Get in touch with them for more information.

SpaceX scrubs Falcon I rocket launch

Filed in Uncategorized Leave a comment

Monday, November 28, 2005

SpaceX called off the much-delayed inaugural launch of their new Falcon 1 rocket on Saturday from Kwajalein’s Omelek Island launch site. The intent was to launch the U.S. Air Force Academy’s FalconSat 2 satellite, which will monitor plasma interactions with the Earth’s upper atmosphere and magnetosphere.

The launch was delayed, then finally cancelled after an oxygen boil-off vent had accidentally been left open. The oxygen was unable to cool the helium pressurant, which then proceeded to evaporate faster than it could be replenished. A main computer issue, probably serious enough to cause a scrub on its own, was also discovered.

This long-anticipated flight was originally expected to be launched in January 2005, however a series of setbacks forced a series of delays, with the flight most recently scheduled to be in early 2006. It was intended to be launched from the Kwajalein atoll in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.

The maiden voyage was originally intended to launch from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California with a Naval Research Laboratory satellite and a Space Services Incorporated space burial payload.

Retrieved from “”

Automobile, motorcycle, and electronic industries center at TWTC & TWTC Nangang

Filed in Uncategorized Leave a comment

Thursday, April 10, 2008

2008 Taipei International Auto Parts & Accessories Show (2008 Taipei AMPA), a trade show for the automotive industry, located at Taipei World Trade Center Nangang Exhibition Hall (TWTC Nangang), opened yesterday and will continue until this Saturday April 12 with two concurrent trade shows for motorcycle and electronic industries at Taipei World Trade Center named Taipei International Automobile Electronics Show (AutoTronics Taipei) & Taiwan International Motorcycle Industry Show (Motorcycle Taiwan).

We [the TAITRA and the automobile industry] ever met a damn difficult problem on show space of this show, because in the past years, there were only three exhibition halls at TWTC (Hall 1, 2, 3), even though we [the TAITRA] do several attempts on scale expansions, still, there’s no enough space for the automobile industry. Finally, After confirmation of its construction of TWTC Nangang, we decided to enroll this show into TWTC Nangang. With 937 companies participating including foreign participants from United Kingdom, Italy, France, Japan, United States, India, Malaysia, Korea, and China, this show will bring on internationalization as the Taipei Cycle and TaiSPO ever concurrently showcased in March.
This industry is an export-oriented market in Taiwan. According to some statistics, its production value reached NT$153.9 billion dollars, and its export value reached USD$471 million dollars, those facts showcased several growths on its [automobile] industry. With several OBMs get certified on innovative products, the brand of “Made in Taiwan” was progressively steady. This echoed our show slogan – “Without Taiwan, You Don’t Get Parts!” I hope the automobile industry in Taiwan can play a great role in the world with participants’ hard works.
This year of Motorcycle Taiwan has some differences especially on the 5th-cycle standard pavilion because the environment issue is progressively focused by the automobile industry in the world. We [the TAITRA] thanked several supports by world-class companies YAMAHA to pay more attentions on this pavilion. I think this issue should be more discussed by professionals from academic units, industry, and governments not only in Taiwan.

The three main shows in different venues, highlighting key issues like the environment, energy-efficiency, and industry transformations. TAITRA held “AutoTronics Forum” and “Taiwan Automotive International Forum & Exhibition” in hopes of forecasting the future of the electronic and automobile industries. Yamaha Corporation put on the “‘Fi’ 5th-Stage Emission Standard Pavilion” to showcase the research achievement and solutions for the future standard of fifth-cycle.

Retrieved from “,_motorcycle,_and_electronic_industries_center_at_TWTC_%26_TWTC_Nangang&oldid=851722”

Equity Of Redemption Described By Real Estate Defined

Filed in Performing Arts Leave a comment

By Mark Aucamp

Equity of Redemption is:

The right of a mortgagor (the borrower) to have his property released to him by performing his obligations under the mortgage (usually by repaying the outstanding debt, including principal, interest and costs to the mortgagee). The equity of redemption-or equitable right of redemption-represents the legal right of the mortgagor to recover the mortgaged property without hindrance, after any default has been rectified. There is an established rule that a mortgagee can never provide at the time of making the loan for any event or condition on which the equity of redemption shall be discharged and the conveyance absolute. The phrase Equity of Redemption as Explained by Real Estate Defined And there is great reason and justice in this rule, for necessitous men are not, truly speaking, free men, but to answer a present exigency will submit to any terms that the crafty may impose upon them, Vernon v Bethell (1762) 2 Eden 110, 113, 28 Eng Rep 838 (Benton Land Co. v. Zeitler, 182 Mo 251, 81 SW 193 (1904); Winklemen v. Sides, 31 Cal App.2d 387, 88 P.2d 147, 155 (1939)). The equity of redemption can also represent a right to compel the mortgagee to release the mortgaged property, even after the mortgagor has defaulted, at any stage before foreclosure, or an exercise of a power of sale, and before any consequent transfer from the mortgagor of an unencumbered title to the mortgagee.

The legal right to get back the mortgaged property, unencumbered, when the mortgagor has complied with the terms of the mortgage deed is sometimes called, especially in the US, the legal right of redemption, or simply the right of redemption; the legal right to redeem even after there has been a breach of a condition of the mortgage or after the contractual date for complying with the terms of the loan, may be known as the equitable right of redemption. These rights together represent the mortgagors equity of redemption.

Equity of Redemption – Common Law

In the common law, the mortgagors equity of redemption this right normally cannot be waived and any covenant in a mortgage that unreasonably prevents redemption, for example by giving inadequate time to repay the debt, is considered as a clog or fetter on the equity of redemption and is unenforceable (Santley v Wilde [1899] 2 Ch 474 (CA); Noakes & Co Ltd v Rice [1902] AC 24, [1900-3] All ER Rep 34 (HL); Peugh v. Davis, 6 Otto 332, 96 US 332, 24 L Ed 775, 776 (1877); Russo v. Wolbers, 116 Mich App 327, 323 NW.2d 385 (1982)). The principle is that, in natural justice and equity the principal right of the mortgagee is to the money, and his right to the land is only as a security for the money, Thornborough v Baker (1675) 2 Swans 628, 630, 36 Eng Rep 1000.

YouTube Preview Image

Equity of Redemption in English Law

In English law, although a clog or fetter on the equity of redemption is void, the right to redeem may be postponed so that the mortgagor is not permitted to repay the principal before the time stipulated in the mortgage deed; provided the postponement is not for an unreasonable length of time given the other terms (especially the interest rate) and is not unconscionable nor oppressive to the nature of a mortgage (Biggs v Hoddinott [1898] 2 Ch 307-owner of public house tied to a brewer for 5 years, but after that free to repay the loan; Fairclough v Swan Brewery Co Ltd [1912] AC 565, [1911-13] All ER Rep 397 (PC)). Postponement is less likely to be considered oppressive when both parties are knowledgeable, acting at arms-length and are independently advised (Knightsbridge Estates Trust Ltd v Byrne [1939] Ch 441, [1938] 2 All ER 444 (CA), affd [1940] AC 613, [1940] 2 All ER 401, 455, 457 (HL)-permitting postponement till the end of 40 years). A clog on the equity of redemption is void if it restricts the right of redemption to a particular person. For example, the mortgagee cannot claim that the heirs of the mortgagee cannot repay the mortgage (Salt v Marquess of Northampton [1892] AC 1, 5 (HL)). Also, a mortgagee may obtain a collateral advantage, such as a restriction on how the mortgaged property is used, or the type of produce sold from the mortgaged premises, while the mortgage subsists, so long as the advantage is not (i) unfair or unconscionable; (ii) in the nature of a penalty clogging the equity of redemption; or (iii) inconsistent with or repugnant to the contractual and the equitable right to redeem (Kreglinger v New Patagonia Meat and Cold Storage Co Ltd [1914] AC 25 (HL)). In addition, .

Equity of Redemption in US Law

In the States, most jurisdictions adhere to the common-law view that a clog or fetter on the equity of redemption should not make the mortgage irredeemable, nor should the mortgagee seek to gain an unfair collateral advantage (Clark v. Reyburn, 8 Wall 318, 75 US 318, 19 L Ed 354, 356 (1869); Russo v. Wolbers, 116 Mich App 327, 323 NW.2d 385 (1982); Humble Oil and Refining Co. v. Doerr, 123 NJ Super 530, 303 A.2d 898, 908 (1973)). However, several jurisdictions take a more free market approach to collateral advantages, so that in the absence of usury statutes being violated, a collateral, eventhough it outlasts redemption, will be relieved against only on general doctrines of oppressiveness and unconscionable advantage, 4 Am.L.Prop. (Boston, MA: 1952), 16.60, p. 112. More

Cf. statutory right of redemption(US). See also consolidation, once a mortgage loan always a mortgage, prepayment penalty, reconveyance, restrictive covenant, solus agreement, unconscionable bargain, undue influence, usury.


15-day FREE TRIAL of or subscribe with FREE copy of Third Edition.

Cases in italics are from the United Kingdom or other common law countries (as indicated); other cases are from the USA.

Terms in bold, including equity of redemption, are defined and explained in detail in our Encyclopedia of Real Estate Terms, Third Edition; as well as ONLINE

About the Author: Damien Abbott, B.Sc.,FRICS is the author of the Encyclopedia of

Real Estate Terms

, now in its 3rd Edition and available ONLINE. Damien is an expert in providing definitions for Real Estate terms and today’s term is




Permanent Link:

Apple plans to sell movies on iTunes

Filed in Uncategorized Leave a comment

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Apple Computer is planning to sell full-length feature films for download via the online iTunes Music Store. The store currently sells digital music tracks, and more recently has begun to sell TV episodes.

Apple executives are in negotiations with film studios to arrange the deal and settle on pricing structures. It is expected that films will retail for around $9.99 US dollars, although some studios are reported to want to set a higher price.

iTunes is currently by the biggest online retailer of digital music, with its software tightly integrated with the popular iPod line of products. Newer versions of the iPod include a colour screen capable of displaying videos, and so consumers could watch the films on the devices, but it is not yet clear how many people will want to do this.

Apple CEO Steve Jobs is also the largest single shareholder of Disney, which now owns animation studio Pixar, however he could end up playing a wider role within the film industry if iTunes becomes the dominant online distributor.

A full-length TV movie, ‘High School Musical‘ from Disney, is already available on iTunes, suggesting that the technical infrastructure is already in place.

Retrieved from “”

11-year-old California girl charged for throwing stone in defense

Filed in Uncategorized Leave a comment

Monday, July 18, 2005

An 11-year-old girl faces serious assault charges in California after casting a stone at a group of boys who were throwing water balloons at her. In April, Maribel Cuevas was apprehended by Fresno, California police and spent five days in a detention center after throwing the object at the group of boys who bombarded her with water balloons as she walked down the sidewalk. A 9-year-old boy was hit with the stone, and suffered a wound to his head requiring medical assistance.

Since then, Cuevas has spent one month under house arrest pending court. Cuevas’ lawyer, Richard Beshwate, told the BBC that “They [Fresno police] are treating her like a violent parole offender. It’s not a felony, it’s an 11-year-old acting like an 11-year-old.”

Fresno Police Sergeant Anthony Martinez told reporters: “We responded. We determined a felony assault had taken place and the officers took the actions that were necessary.” Cuevas is due back in court next month on felony assault charges.

The girl was placed in juvenile hall during her five-day detention, with only one 30-minute visit from her parents. She was then placed under a 30 day house arrest and required to wear an electronic monitoring bracelet. The house arrest allowed the girl to attend school.

Maribel, who knows very little English, said that the boy initiated the conflict — the boy also admitted as much.

Retrieved from “”

How Hyperhidrosis Is Cured. 3 Tips To Eliminate Excessive Sweating Naturally

Filed in Hyperhidrosis Surgery Leave a comment

How Hyperhidrosis Is Cured. 3 Tips To Eliminate Excessive Sweating NaturallyBy Julian Andres Alzate

The first thing to understand is that hyperhidrosis or sweating is a condition in which a person sweats too much and suddenly. People with hyperhidrosis seem to have overactive sweat glands.

Excessive sweating affects 5% of the population, and only 40% of the people who suffer from it, seek medical attention to find the right treatment. Hyperhidrosis has become an epidemic!

Real case:

“Since I was 11 years old I started to sweat, my life has been hell, nobody would think that a girl like me would suffer from this in school had to wear summer and winter jacket, wear 2 poles, wear deodorant, I have been limited to using colors never have been able to wear a red, green, blue polo, never, I had to buy clothes of certain fabrics no more (LICRA IMPOSIBLEE) avoid parties, in love, hug friends, etc.. the truth I felt self-conscious throughout my high school I could not play basketball or volleyball or running was tried all the existing deodorants rexona, nivea, lady speed, dove, endorsement, label, NADAA ME WORKED until a few months ago I bought HIDROFUGAL thinking that it would turn out and the truth NADAA, finish the school This problem ruined everything until the promotion party (it was fatal), well I started college and the first days the worst torment you can imagine thinking they would realize was the worst I found a natural method to link

Advice1. Determine what type of sweating is suffered. Primary or secondary hyperhidrosis

There are two types to distinguish: primary or focal hyperhidrosis and secondary hyperhidrosis. Primary or focal hyperhidrosis affects the hands, feet and armpits in particular.

On the other hand, secondary hyperhidrosis affects the body as a whole; It is not as common as the primary. It can be caused by various conditions, such as the symptoms of menopause, hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, type 2 diabetes or mellitus, obesity, heart disease, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), lung ailments, tumors, tuberculosis, diseases autoimmune and nervous system abnormality in terms of dimension of the sweat glands.

Secondary hyperhidrosis may also be due to the intake of certain medications or addictive substances.

Tip 2. Determine the different methods or treatments

Antiperspirants Excessive sweating can be controlled with strong antiperspirants, which cover the sweat ducts. Products containing 10% to 20% aluminum chloride hexahydrate are the first treatment for underarm sweating.

Iontophoresis. This procedure uses electricity to temporarily deactivate the sweat glands. It is more effective for the sweating of the hands and feet. The hands or feet are put in water and then a soft electric current is passed through it.

Botox Botulinum toxin type A (Botox) is used for the treatment of intense sweating in the armpits, feet and hands. This condition is called primary axillary hyperhidrosis.

Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (STE). In some severe cases, a minimally invasive surgical procedure called sympathectomy may be recommended if other treatments have not worked.

Por lo general, los tratamientos contra la hiperhidrosis ms conocidos atacan el problema pero no la raz del problema. Qu sucede luego? El problema regresa porque no ha sido erradicado, simplemente se lo control por un tiempo. Y lo peor es que a veces regresa con ms fuerza y violencia que antes. “Basta de Sudor” va ms all de la cura temporaria. Apunta al control permanente de la sudoracin excesiva.

Tip 3. Natural Treatment Hyperhidrosis without surgery:

Basta de Sudor ™ “teaches the method, scientifically proven, with which you can completely reverse Hyperhidrosis, and if you suffer from bromihidrosis, teaches how you can minimize the amount of bad smell persistently persistent, unpleasant and very penetrating.

It does not matter how long you have Hyperhidrosis. No matter your sex or age. And it does not matter your current physical condition.

For more information on the natural method to eliminate excessive sweating click

Descarga Sistema

Student faces expulsion over blog post

Filed in Uncategorized Leave a comment

Sunday, May 28, 2006

A 17-year-old student faces expulsion by the Plainfield School District in Plainfield, Illinois as a result of blog posts he made on which were critical of the school staff, alleging bullying and intimidation. The student has already been suspended for 10 days for the “inappropriate comments” and “threats” the school felt he had expressed on his blog. The posts were not made on school time or with school equipment.

On May 1, the student posted the following message that apparently initiated the suspension:

“dear plainfield school district 202:
i know you read this. and you suck. suspend me or what ever you would like to do. but this is my fuckin web site and i can put what ever i want on it. kinda goes with the first amendment. by suspending kyle again for his xanga you guys are pathetic and totally irrational. first amendment you fucks. freedom of speech. and who the fuck are you to say what some one can do from there own personal computer. one more thing kiss my ass.”

On May 2, the student continued his passionate rant, giving some background to the controversy:

“you are bully’s. I feel threatened by you. if you don’t like what you see here then do not come here its that simple. I’m pretty sure when you suspended Sam you brought her to tears, you are a bully and you make me sick. there’s nothing you can do about us posting about parties we’ve been to and how much liquor we had or how much pot was smoked, the police need to do a better job, you are not the police. and how is it that you feel threatened what was said that was so threatening. I feel threatened by you, I cant even have a public web page with out you bullying me and telling me what has to be removed. where is this freedom of speech that this government is sworn to uphold? none of this is posted at school, its all posted from our home computers, and once we step foot into our homes we are not on school property any more. you are just power hungry, don’t you ever think? did you stop to think that maybe this will make parents angry that you are bullying their children around? did you ever stop to think that maybe now you really are going to have a threat on your hands now that you have just pissed off kids for voicing their opinions? did you ever stop to think this will start a community backlash? The kids at Columbine did what they did because they were bullied. In my opinion you are the real threat here. None of us ever put in our xanga’s that they were going to kill or bring harm to any one. we voiced our opinions. you are the real threat here. you are depriving us of our right to learn. now stick that in your pipe and smoke it.”

Attorney Carl Buck, who feels the school authorities have overstepped their boundaries, says, “The district is going to take away the student’s education for exercising his freedom of speech… I feel like they are trying to control his freedom of speech. … He is saying, ‘You can’t bully people and we have a right to object and you can’t throw people out of school for voicing their opinions.'”

Other students at the school posted messages of support in their own Xanga blogs. A blogger named Meghan wrote, “As Americans, we have the right to speak our mind.” Another student, Heather, who found out about the possible expulsion through the local news, wrote that “first of all, Xanga is outside of school … second of all … there was no threat towards anyone on his posts.”

In a related case in March 2006, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that an Alaska high school acted improperly by suspending a student for carrying a banner reading “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” across the street from the school.

Retrieved from “”

Controversial development training cited in religious discrimination lawsuits

Filed in Uncategorized Leave a comment

Friday, May 23, 2008

A controversial development training course called “Landmark Forum” is cited in religious discrimination lawsuits in United States federal courts in New York and Washington, D.C. The seminars are run by a San Francisco, California-based for-profit training company called Landmark Education. The company evolved from Erhard Seminars Training “est”, and has faced criticism regarding its techniques and its use of unpaid labor. The sperm bank and surrogacy company Los Angeles-based Growing Generations is named as a defendant in the New York lawsuit, and the Democratic political action committee Twenty-First Century Democrats is a defendant in the Washington, D.C. case.

In separate lawsuits filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan, New York, and in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in Washington, D.C., former employees are suing their employers for monetary damages and claiming religious discrimination after their employers allegedly mandated that they attend courses at Landmark Education.

In the US$3 million federal lawsuit filed in New York, Scott Glasgow is suing his former employer Growing Generations and its CEO Stuart Miller. Growing Generations maintains sperm banks and also arranges surrogacy for gay couples who wish to have children. The company has offices in New York and Los Angeles, and has done business with celebrities including actor B. D. Wong of Law & Order: SVU.

Glasgow was marketing director of Growing Generations, and claims he was fired in June 2007 after refusing to continue attending Landmark Education seminars. Glasgow is also suing for sexual harassment, and claims Miller came on to him in September 2006. He made approximately $100,000 per year as the company’s marketing director, and was the company’s only employee based out of New York City. The company’s main offices are in Los Angeles.

I want them to stop imposing Landmark on the employees, and I want an apology.

“I was shocked when I was fired. It took me months to right myself. I want them to stop imposing Landmark on the employees, and I want an apology,” said Glasgow in a statement in The Village Voice. Brent Pelton, one of Glasgow’s attorneys, stated that: “The Landmark philosophy is deeply ingrained in the culture of the company”. Glasgow said that the Landmark Education training courses were “opposite” to his Christian beliefs. According to Glasgow he was questioned by Miller in May 2007 after he walked out of a Landmark Education course, and was fired shortly thereafter. “We stand by the allegations contained in the complaint and we look forward to proving them at trial,” said Pelton in a statement to ABC News.

Ian Wallace, an attorney who represents Growing Generations, claimed that Glasgow wasn’t fired but walked away from his position. “Growing Generations and Mr. Miller are very confident that these claims will be dismissed ultimately, and there’s no factual basis for them whatsoever,” said Wallace in a statement to The Village Voice. Lawyers representing Growing Generations and Stuart Miller declined comment to The New York Post, and did not immediately return a message from ABC News.

In Glasgow’s complaint, entered into federal court record on April 18, he asserts that Landmark Education constitutes a “religion”, and “perceived their philosophy as a form of religion that contradicted his own personal beliefs”. He states that when he was promoted to Director of Marketing, he asked Miller if he could stop attending the Landmark sessions but was told that they were mandatory for all of the company’s executives and that Landmark is “very much the language of the company.” Glasgow said his performance at the company was assessed based on how he was “touching, moving and inspiring” others, a phrase from the Landmark philosophy, as opposed to his business accomplishments at the company. The complaint claims that the actions of Miller and Growing Generations violated Federal, New York State and New York City civil rights laws.

The lawsuit filed in federal court in Washington, D.C. deals with a separate plaintiff and company, but the plaintiff in the suit also claims that religious discrimination took place for allegedly being mandated to attend Landmark Education courses. Kenneth Goldman is suing the United States Democratic political action committee Twenty-First Century Democrats (also 21st Century Democrats) and its former executive director Kelly Young. Goldman was formerly the communications director of 21st Century Democrats.

According to Goldman’s complaint, three employees of 21st Century Democrats were fired after refusing to attend the Landmark Forum course. The complaint asserts that Landmark Education has “religious characteristics and theological implications” which influenced the mission of 21st Century Democrats and the way the organization conducted business. Goldman’s complaint states that in addition to himself, a training director and field director were also fired after they made it clear they would not attend the Landmark Forum.

Goldman says executive director Young infused Landmark Education jargon terms into staff meetings such as “create possibilities”, “create a new context”, and “enroll in possibilities”. He also claims that Young “urged” staff members to participate in Landmark Education events outside of the workplace, drove employees to and from Landmark functions, and used funds from 21st Century Democrats to pay for employees to attend those functions. Goldman’s complaint asserts that he was discriminated against in violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act.

While we are not a party to this lawsuit and have no firsthand knowledge of it, we can only assume that we are being used as a legal and political football to further the plaintiff”s own financial interests.

In a statement in The Washington Times, the executive director of 21st Century Democrats, Mark Lotwis, called the lawsuit “frivolous” and said: “we’re going to defend our organization’s integrity”. Landmark Education spokeswoman Deborah Beroset said that the Landmark Forum “is in no way religious in nature and any claim to the contrary is simply absurd,” and stated: “While we are not a party to this lawsuit and have no firsthand knowledge of it, we can only assume that we are being used as a legal and political football to further the plaintiff”s own financial interests.”

The New York lawsuit was filed April 14, and is still in early filing stages. A conference with the federal court judge in the case has been scheduled for June 17. The Washington, D.C. suit began in November 2007, and entered mediation this past March. As of April 15 the parties in the case were due back to court on July 11 to update the court on the mediation process.

Landmark Education is descended from Erhard Seminars Training, also called “est”, which was founded by Werner Erhard. est began in 1971, and Erhard’s company Werner Erhard and Associates repackaged the course as “The Forum” in 1985. Associates of Erhard bought the license to his “technology” and incorporated Landmark Education in California in 1991.

This is not the first time employees have sued claiming mandatory attendance at “Forum” workshops violated their civil rights. In a lawsuit filed in December 1988 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, eight employees of DeKalb Farmers Market in Decatur, Georgia sued their employer claiming their religious freedom and civil rights were violated when they were allegedly coerced into attending “Forum” training sessions. “Many of these training programs, particularly at large corporations, claim to be purely psychological, aimed at improving productivity and morale and loyalty. But in fact they are religious,” said University of Denver religious studies professor Carl Raschke in a statement to The Wall Street Journal.

The DeKalb Farmers Market employees were represented by lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union. Consulting Technologies Inc., an affiliate of Transformational Technologies Inc., was named as a party in the lawsuit. Transformational Technologies was founded by Werner Erhard, and was not named as a party in the suit. The “Forum” course that the employees claimed they were mandated to attend was developed by Werner Erhard and Associates. Employees said that they were fired or pressured to quit after they objected to the Forum courses.

The workers claimed that the Forum course contradicted with their religious beliefs. The plaintiffs in the suit included adherents of varying religious backgrounds, including Christianity and Hinduism. “The sessions put people into a hibernating state. They ask for total loyalty. It’s like brainwashing,” said Dong Shik Kim, one of the plaintiffs in the case. The plaintiffs said they lost their jobs after objecting to a “new age quasi-religious cult” which they said was developed by Werner Erhard.

The DeKalb Farmers Market denied the allegations, and an attorney for the company Edward D. Buckley III told The Wall Street Journal that employees were encouraged, not coerced, to attend the training sessions. According to The Wall Street Journal, The Forum said it would not sanction workers being coerced to attend its training sessions.

The parties in the DeKalb Farmers Market religious discrimination case came to a settlement in May 1989, and the case was dismissed with prejudice in June. The terms of the out-of-court settlement were not made public, but the employees’ attorney Amy Totenberg told The Wall Street Journal that the case “has made employers come to grips with the legitimate boundaries of employee training”.

According to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, employers must “reasonably accommodate” their employees’ religious beliefs unless this creates “undue hardship”. In September 1988, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued a policy-guidance notice which stated that New Age courses should be handled under Title VII of the Act. According to the Commission, employers must provide “reasonable accommodation” if an employee challenges a training course, unless this causes “undue hardship” for the company.

In October 2006, Landmark Education took legal action against Google, YouTube, the Internet Archive and a website owner in Queensland, Australia in attempts to remove criticism of its products from the Internet. The company sought a subpoena under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in an attempt to discover the identity of an anonymous critic who uploaded a 2004 French documentary of the Landmark Forum to the Internet. “Voyage au pays des nouveaux gourous” (Voyage to the Land of the New Gurus) was produced by Pièces à Conviction, a French investigative journalism news program. The Electronic Frontier Foundation represented the anonymous critic and the Internet Archive, and Landmark withdrew its subpoena in November 2006 in exchange for a promise from the anonymous critic not to repost the video.

Landmark Education itself has come under scrutiny for its controversial labor practices. The company has been investigated by the United States Department of Labor in separate investigations originating out of California, Colorado, and Texas. Investigations focused on the heavy reliance of unpaid labor in the company’s workforce, which Landmark Education calls “assistants” and deems volunteers.

An investigation by the U.S. Dept. Labor based out of Colorado found that activities performed by Landmark Education’s “assistants” include: “office, clerical, telephone solicitation and enrollment, as well as greeting customers, setting up chairs, handling microphones during the seminars and making coffee. Additionally, a number of volunteers actually teach the courses and provide testimonials during and after the courses.” The Colorado investigation’s 1996 report found that “No records are kept of any hours worked by any employees.” According to a 1998 article in Metro Silicon Valley: “In the end the Department of Labor dropped the issue, leaving Landmark trumpeting about its volunteers’ choice in the matter.” Metro Silicon Valley reported that Landmark Education at the time employed 451 paid staff, and also utilized the services of 7,500 volunteers.

After an investigation into Landmark Education’s labor practices by the U.S. Dept. Labor’s offices out of California, the company was deemed to have overtime violations. According to the Department of Labor’s 2004 report on the investigation, back wages of $187,569.01 were found due to 45 employees. An investigation by the U.S. Dept. Labor in Texas which concluded in 2005 stated: “Minimum wage violation found. Volunteers (Assistants) are not paid any wages for hours worked while performing the major duties of the firm. The assistants set up rooms, call registrants, collect fees, keep stats of classroom data/participants, file, they also are answering phones, training and leading seminars.”

The Texas investigation also discovered an overtime violation. Landmark Education agreed to pay back wages for the overtime violation, but did not comply with the overtime violation found by the U.S. Dept. Labor for the “assistants”. Landmark Education denied that the “assistants” are employees, though the Department of Labor report concluded: “Interviews reveal that the employees are taking payments, registering clients, billing, training, recruiting, setting up locations, cleaning, and other duties that would have to be performed by staff if the assistants did not perform them.”

According to the 2004 investigative report by Pièces à Conviction in the “Voyage au pays des nouveaux gourous” program, Landmark Education was investigated by the French government in 1995. In the “Voyage au pays des nouveaux gourous” program volunteers were filmed through a hidden camera and shown performing duties for Landmark Education in France including manning phones, recruitment and financial work for the company, and one volunteer was shown cleaning a toilet.

Le Nouvel Observateur reported that after “Voyage au pays des nouveaux gourous” aired in France, labor inspectors investigated Landmark Education’s use of unpaid volunteers. According to Le Nouvel Observateur, one month after the labor investigation took place the French branch of the company had disbanded. A former “Introduction Leader” to the Landmark Forum, Lars Bergwik, has recently posted a series of videos to YouTube critical of the company and its practices. Bergwik appeared on a 2004 investigative journalism program on Sweden’s Channel 4, Kalla Fakta (Cold Facts). According to Bergwik, after the Kalla Fakta program on Landmark Education aired, “Landmark left Sweden”.

Retrieved from “”

Colleges offering admission to displaced New Orleans graduate students

Filed in Uncategorized Leave a comment

See the discussion page for instructions on adding schools to this list.Tuesday, September 13, 2005

NAICU has created a list of colleges and universities accepting and/or offering assistance to displace faculty members. [1]Wednesday, September 7, 2005

This list is taken from Colleges offering admission to displaced New Orleans students, and is intended to make searching easier for faculty, graduate, and professional students.

In addition to the list below, the Association of American Law Schools has compiled a list of law schools offering assistance to displaced students. [2] As conditions vary by college, interested parties should contact the Office of Admissions at the school in question for specific requirements and up-to-date details.

The Association of American Medical Colleges is coordinating alternatives for medical students and residents displaced by Hurricane Katrina. [3] is acting as a central interactive hub for establishing research support in times of emergency. With so many scientists affected by Hurricane Katrina, ResCross is currently focused on providing information to identify sources of emergency support as quickly as possible. [4]

With so many scientists affected by Hurricane Katrina, ResCross is currently focused on providing information to identify sources of emergency support as quickly as possible.

Physics undergraduates, grad students, faculty and high school teachers can be matched up with housing and jobs at universities, schools and industry. [5] From the American Association of Physics Teachers, the Society of Physics Students, the American Institute of Physics and the American Physical Society.

If you are seeking or providing assistance, please use this site to find information on research support, available lab space/supplies, resources, guidelines and most importantly to communicate with fellow researchers.

The following is a partial list, sorted by location.

Alabama |Alaska |Arizona |Arkansas |California |Colorado |Connecticut |Delaware |District of Columbia |Florida |Georgia |Hawaii |Idaho |Illinois |Indiana |Iowa |Kansas |Kentucky |Louisiana |Maine |Maryland |Massachusetts |Michigan |Minnesota |Mississippi |Missouri |Montana |Nebraska |Nevada |New Hampshire |New Jersey |New Mexico |New York |North Carolina |North Dakota |Ohio |Oklahoma |Oregon |Pennsylvania |Rhode Island |South Carolina |South Dakota |Tennessee |Texas |Utah |Vermont |Virginia |Washington |West Virginia |Wisconsin |Wyoming |Canada

Retrieved from “”